John W. Carlin and Civic Leadership
Join the Conversation:
  • Home
  • About John
  • Blog
  • Leading and Learning Moments
  • Leader Corner
  • Resources
    • Feedback

Did Sanity Suddenly Return During the Special Session?

6/28/2016

5 Comments

 
Following the Legislature in Special Session last Friday certainly kept me busy with my Twitter account. For most of the day, it appeared it was going to take some time to solve the immediate challenge of funding schools in Kansas at an equitable level, as deemed by the Kansas Constitution. Then suddenly out of the blue, they not only got the votes needed but almost unanimous votes in both houses. They got done in two days what had to be done in the short term. It could have taken ten, and I would not have been surprised. Given the court's response today, it appears the immediate crisis has been momentarily satisfied. So does this mean sanity suddenly returned to the Legislature during the Special Session? Unfortunately, the short answer is "no," but nonetheless, there were some important things we can take away from the two days of turmoil we witnessed last week.

First, it’s important to remember that the Special Session was only convened to address the equity portion of the lawsuit, yet to come is a decision on whether the funding levels of Kansas schools are constitutionally adequate. This means that more important decisions loom next year, when a more sustainable fix will be required. So what did we learn from this Special Session about the incumbents who will be seeking the opportunity to make these crucial decisions for our state, and what kind of representation will be required in order to get it right?

To me, an obvious takeaway from the Special Session is that, for one of the very few times, the ideas and leadership of moderate Republicans and Democrats were taken seriously. The interesting question is: why? From what I have learned, the pro-education legislators had done their homework and were better prepared to propose something that would work. Helping this might have been the desire of the current leadership to avoid more bad publicity and get their folks home to raise money and campaign. In this case, confirming “why” is not as important as what we, as voters, should do as a result of this. It’s critical that we take this as further incentive to review carefully our choices in the coming elections, and that we see there is a better way forward—one that’s possible through the election of more consensus-building problem solvers to the legislature.
​
It’s also important that the legislature avoided, in the end, doing anything really outlandish during the Special Session. The only non-essential issue raised was the leadership’s constitutional amendment introduced to take the Supreme Court, (for now) an equal branch of government, out of any power to impact adequate and appropriate funding of public schools. Fortunately, for the sake of Kansas and public education, it failed by one vote to receive the ⅔ vote necessary for passage, going down to defeat in the State Senate. Along with eight Democrats, six Republican Senators stood up to the pressure of the Senate leadership and voted for public education. Come August 2nd and November 8th, if you live in any of these fourteen Senate districts and you want quality public schools, good judgment, and courage, you have your candidate to support. If you live in one of the other twenty-six Senate districts (or a House district held by someone who supports the direction of the current administration), electing different representation, regardless of party affiliation, will be needed in order to defend Kansas schools from further attacks, unconstitutional actions, and short-sighted policies.

​Truly restoring sanity will require many steps over the course of several election cycles and legislative sessions. But it's imperative that we make significant strides along that path during this election year and sustain that momentum in the years to come.
5 Comments
Kim Witt
6/29/2016 07:44:40 am

Where do we see a list of voters on the Supreme Court? Who were the 8 dems and 6 reps?

Reply
LADONNA SANDERS
6/29/2016 09:12:01 am

Bowers(R) north central Ks, District 36
Faust-Goudeau (D) Wichita, Dist. 29
Francisco (D) Lawrence, Dist. 2
Haley (D) Kansas City, Dist. 4
Hawk (D) Manhattan, Dist. 22
Hensley (D) Topeka, Dist. 19
Holland (D), Lawrence, Dist. 3
Kelly (D) Topeka, Dist. 18
Kerschen (R) Wichita, Dist. 26
Longbine (R) Emporia, Dist. 17
McGinn (R) Wichita and Newton, Dist. 31
V. Schmidt (R) Topeka, Dist. 20
Wolf (R) Prairie Village, Dist. 7

Reply
Jack Kelley link
6/29/2016 03:29:21 pm

It amazes me that so many voters have no idea how their representatives vote on legislative issues. Thus, they are not sure who to vote for. Will your group be publicly endorsing candidates for all districts? It would be a big help to many.

Reply
Kam McEwen
6/29/2016 03:45:56 pm

You left off Steve Becker (R) of the 104th district in Reno CO. He should have been on your list of Republican moderates

Reply
RadioFreeKansas
6/29/2016 07:55:15 pm

But they continue to rob Peter to pay Paul, taking money from TANF, the Highway fund and the Tobacco settlement among others. Money that should have been used elsewhere.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    John W. Carlin​—​61st Speaker of the Kansas House, 40th Governor of Kansas, 8th Archivist of the United States, and student of leadership

    Categories

    All
    Agriculture
    Budgets And Taxation
    Capital Punishment
    China
    Civic Engagement
    Drinking Age
    Education
    Election 2016
    Election 2018
    Election 2020
    Election 2022
    Election 2024
    Environment
    Health Care
    Higher Education
    Historical Perspective
    Infrastructure
    Judicial System
    Leadership
    LGBTQ Rights
    National Archives
    Research
    Teaching

    Facebook

    John W. Carlin

    Twitter

    Tweets by @johnwcarlin

    Subscribe

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

    RSS Feed