John W. Carlin and Civic Leadership
Join the Conversation:
  • Home
  • About John
  • Blog
  • Leading and Learning Moments
  • Leader Corner
  • Resources
    • Feedback

Presidential Race Lacking Leadership Discussion

10/27/2015

2 Comments

 
Whether in individual interviews or future debates, are enough of the right questions being asked to the candidates? I fear there is too little attention paid to the “doing” aspects of the presidency. Okay, you’re for this and opposed to that, but to be successful, how are you going to get the job done? What is your executive style? What will be your approach in working with Congress and, in particular, the opposing party? What experience have you had that makes you qualified and, if there is a gap, what are you going to do about addressing it?

What we don’t have is any discussion of how up to this point they have dealt with executive leadership, as in putting a team together, dealing with conflict, and making tough decisions. For those who have limited executive experience, how would they plan to deal with such challenges? Are they comfortable and experienced surrounding themselves with talent and diversity? Do they have to be the smartest person in the room?

I don’t recall many of these questions being asked in previous presidential campaigns either. For example, candidates like then-Senator Obama—who came in with little or no executive experience—were rarely pressed to share their approaches to running the country. I’m not suggesting this to disqualify anyone from the presidency, but I’d like to hear how they intend to compensate for this gap. Do they know it is a gap? What will they do to address it? What has been their experience in filling high-profile jobs as well as firing and what have they learned? What other experiences have they had that demonstrate their leadership capacity? What values are most important to have for someone wanting to be a part of your team?
 
This will not happen unless citizens start pressing for the questions to be answered directly or through the press who start seeing the value and start asking these questions. The way it is going now, the election result will be tied to raising money, effectively using modern technology to organize and get people out to vote, TV commercials, and finding ways to rip the opponent. Come Election Day, voters will have little or no information on how the candidates would do the job.

Through the comment section below as well as through other blog posts about the debates and media coverage, I plan to follow up on this issue and keep an eye on other forums where these questions could be addressed. It is my hope that each of us, as voters, can learn together through this process to select our next President.
2 Comments
John W. Carlin link
10/29/2015 11:46:09 am

Republican Presidential Debate: October 28th, 2015

I know the Royals were playing, but if you had a chance to watch the 3rd GOP Presidential Debates (plural because they still have two rounds of candidates) last night, what did you think of the questions? Leave a Reply to this comment and let me know your perspective.

My Reactions:
They sort of opened with one question that somewhat responded to my concern by asking for a weakness they have. Only Dr. Ben Carson responded, with everyone else just taking the time to say something they had planned in advance. The panel used the obvious 'gotcha' questions with almost everyone well-prepared. That was it.

One interesting moment was when they discussed Daily Fantasy Sports, which Gov. Chris Christie knocked out of the park by mentioning all the other issues we have that should take precedence in a Presidential Debate. In both debates, Sen. Lindsey Graham was the only one who emphasized how he would do the job and his a record that backs it up. He said he would actually try to work with Democrats to deal with immigration again, address the long-term challenges of entitlements in a positive way, and, whether you agree with his specific direction or not, clearly be a bold Commander in Chief.

However, even during the questions on substance, with so many candidates, there was not the follow-up to really get the facts on the table. It wasn’t the last debate and there will be countless more interviews with each of the candidates, so there will plenty of opportunities to address some of these critical leadership questions as the campaign continues. We can always hope that we will learn more.

Reply
Tim
10/29/2015 12:23:32 pm

Agreed. Even the "substance" was not very substantive.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    John W. Carlin​—​61st Speaker of the Kansas House, 40th Governor of Kansas, 8th Archivist of the United States, and student of leadership

    Categories

    All
    Agriculture
    Budgets And Taxation
    Capital Punishment
    China
    Civic Engagement
    Drinking Age
    Education
    Election 2016
    Election 2018
    Election 2020
    Election 2022
    Election 2024
    Environment
    Health Care
    Higher Education
    Historical Perspective
    Infrastructure
    Judicial System
    Leadership
    LGBTQ Rights
    National Archives
    Research
    Teaching

    Facebook

    John W. Carlin

    Twitter

    Tweets by @johnwcarlin

    Subscribe

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

    RSS Feed