John W. Carlin and Civic Leadership
Join the Conversation:
  • Home
  • About John
  • Blog
  • Leader Exchange
  • Leading and Learning Moments
  • Leader Corner
  • Resources
    • Feedback

The Drinking Age: Time to Go Back to 18

10/8/2015

5 Comments

 
I was Governor of Kansas in 1984 when President Ronald Reagan and his administration, in a not-so-subtle fashion, blackmailed states to change state laws on access to alcohol from 18 to 21 years of age. The question now is, after over thirty years of experience with the drinking age at 21, is it really working and accomplishing the worthy goals that were set forth? I say no. But more than that, I say in many ways it has done harm not anticipated at the time. Consumption of alcohol by 18, 19, and 20 year olds has, in my assessment, not gone down—although one can find stats to back up whatever position you take. What has really happened is that their drinking has gone underground and likely has accelerated the huge issue of binge drinking, particularly on college campuses. Given that much of the activity has moved from public facilities to the shadows where any kind of supervision or oversight is for practical purposes gone, this should not surprise us.

Law enforcement and local courts spend time and resources trying to enforce the current law with limited success, where if the law was changed, their focus could be on the real problem of excessive and binge drinking and the many other costs associated with it—including big problems like drinking and driving, domestic violence, and sexual assault. If more of the drinking is brought back into public view, consumption might even go down. In 1986, as Governor of Kansas, I also pushed the state to modernize our liquor laws and change the Constitution to allow liquor to be sold by the drink. It was passed on a 2 to 1 margin over the threat that consumption would soar and driving fatalities would dramatically increase. Neither took place, and in fact, consumption went down in the immediate years that followed.
​
I suggest this with absolutely no disrespect to MADD. I simply believe we have given it enough time and, with the results, we have the justification to change back. I’m motivated and informed by my ten years on a college campus and going on three years as a faculty advisor to a fraternity. Young people drinking is not the problem. It is the irresponsible use of alcohol and binge drinking that makes no sense and causes real harm. If we put the energy and money wasted on enforcing a law that can’t be enforced into the real problems, we’d be much better off. So let’s do it. Make it 18, and add more common sense back into our alcohol laws.

But You Tell Me...

5 Comments
Tom Brungardt
10/8/2015 12:45:19 pm

Much of what the Governor wrote in this column has been on my mind for some time. It isn't just the drinking age that is the problem. It is also a lack of education on how to enjoy alcohol without having drunkenness as a goal. When my daughter turned 21, she participated in the "21 shots" ritual in Aggieville. Not safe. I believe these kinds of rites of passage would be tempered with a more sensible attitude towards drinking, one that begins with lowering the drinking age.

Reply
Virleen Carlson
10/8/2015 02:28:06 pm

what won me over to the age 21 side was the reasoning that our 14-year olds know 18-year old buyers but don't know many 21-year olds who would buy for them.

Reply
John Marshall
10/8/2015 04:56:37 pm

The governor is as always, correct. The subject prompts my recollection of an incident long ago, when I was a college senior, at the old Kansas City airport downtown - a young Marine, en route home on leave after a tour in Vietnam, the bartender pained at having to refuse the young soldier, in formal greens, medals shined, his request for a beer. The soldier apologized. I ordered the beer, moved it toward the Marine, and the bartender moved away.

Reply
JAMES A MARPLES
10/11/2015 03:30:33 pm

In my view...the "legal age" IS "the LEGAL age" for whatever pertains to contractual law ... whether it be voting, drinking or getting a business-license. Having ONE SET AGE would make things "uniform" and avoid "confusion". ---As to drinking & other things....responsible behavior needs to be taught at home. ---Even some of my ex-classmates...past age 30 still haven't "grown up" {so to speak}. I think one set legal age of "adulthood" is sufficient.

Reply
Jeremy miller
10/27/2015 11:33:00 am

If they are old enough to serve in a foreign land and be wounded or killed then they should be able to get a drink legally

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    John W. Carlin​—​61st Speaker of the Kansas House, 40th Governor of Kansas, 8th Archivist of the United States, and student of leadership

    Categories

    All
    Agriculture
    Budgets And Taxation
    Capital Punishment
    China
    Civic Engagement
    Drinking Age
    Education
    Election 2016
    Election 2018
    Election 2020
    Election 2022
    Election 2024
    Environment
    Health Care
    Higher Education
    Historical Perspective
    Infrastructure
    Judicial System
    Leadership
    LGBTQ Rights
    National Archives
    Research
    Teaching

    Facebook

    John W. Carlin

    Twitter

    Tweets by johnwcarlin

    Subscribe

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

    RSS Feed